Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59

Thread: Future of the LPD

  1. #41
    Inactive Member VHSLhelper's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2005
    Posts
    861
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by Counts View Post
    Rose Ridge....Closer to Clintwood than the other 2 High Schools but 1 mile from the Geographacal center of the county....Not sure on the EXACT site but near the radio tower (From what I understand)

    The plan as I currently understand it is to build a HS and Middle school as well as all Athletic Fields at that site
    don't forget the new tech. school.

    They're looking at about 150 acres, which involves over a dozen landowners. A retired couple owns 50 of the acres & have said for years that they don't want to sell... they want to stay there until they die.

  2. #42
    Inactive Member Sat_morning_QB's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 26th, 2002
    Posts
    430
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Looks like someone need to get the McAfee boys on retainer, seem like the whole Div1 on this side of Chilhowie has a case for a suit. He's always wanted a reason to get the VHSL dissolved and send those Billions back to the schools

  3. #43
    Inactive Member Jason's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 12th, 2002
    Posts
    3,146
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by Sat_morning_QB View Post
    so half of D-1 in the Region would have 1st rd games against Region B? I don't see the coaches or priniciples approving that plan because of the travel costs, the VHSL would lose a ton of money because you will have to have overnight stays. You think if TW makes it there gonna head out on Saturday monring for a game 1:30 kickoff at any of these William Campbell, Riverheads, or Buffalo Gap. I have been to each one of those schools to see games in the last 2 years and the shortest drive is 4hrs going 75 mph on I- 81. To get there by 11:30 from Norton on a bus you would have to leave at 6:30 including a breakfast stop add 90 min for TW.
    Thats not what he said. The only Region B teams moving will be the D2 teams. Also Tom Walker would not have to travel to Buffalo Gap if it was so because BG will move up to D2. D1 will be a ton easier to win the state in with this plan because you will no longer see the 500+ enrollment schools playing in D1 anymore. You could see Thomas Walker travel but some of the Region C teams will be moving to the East side. The biggest amount of travel will be in D2 not D1. This plan has already been approved but not made final. It is going to happen but we dont have full details because it in not final. This is by far better than what we have in place now. D1 teams in this area will have a lot better chance to win state than they do now. Also they have talked about making neutral sites if teams are 200+ miles apart. That way if it was 200 miles between they will find a site to where the teams would meet in the middle. It is a 2 year trial so who knows what will happen. This is something I have been wanting to see for years. Right now the current setup is hell for teams like Norton, or one of our other small D1 schools to win State. Right now Norton with an enrollment of 252 would see a team like Buffalo Gap with the enrollment of 608 in the State Title Game. Next year BG will be D2. Only 2 teams in Region B will be D1 next year. Altavista and William Campbell. Altavista will be d2 if their enrollment increases by 4+ students. Radford will not have to travel to Nandua because Nandua will stay in D2 with their enrollment being over 700. Radford will be D1 unless their enrollment goes up more than 11 students. Lets give this a chance. It will showcase some excellent matchups instead of the same old same old we see every year now.

  4. #44
    Inactive Member Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 1999
    Posts
    1,019
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason View Post
    Thats not what he said. The only Region B teams moving will be the D2 teams. Also Tom Walker would not have to travel to Buffalo Gap if it was so because BG will move up to D2. D1 will be a ton easier to win the state in with this plan because you will no longer see the 500+ enrollment schools playing in D1 anymore. You could see Thomas Walker travel but some of the Region C teams will be moving to the East side. The biggest amount of travel will be in D2 not D1. This plan has already been approved but not made final. It is going to happen but we dont have full details because it in not final. This is by far better than what we have in place now. D1 teams in this area will have a lot better chance to win state than they do now. Also they have talked about making neutral sites if teams are 200+ miles apart. That way if it was 200 miles between they will find a site to where the teams would meet in the middle. It is a 2 year trial so who knows what will happen. This is something I have been wanting to see for years. Right now the current setup is hell for teams like Norton, or one of our other small D1 schools to win State. Right now Norton with an enrollment of 252 would see a team like Buffalo Gap with the enrollment of 608 in the State Title Game. Next year BG will be D2. Only 2 teams in Region B will be D1 next year. Altavista and William Campbell. Altavista will be d2 if their enrollment increases by 4+ students. Radford will not have to travel to Nandua because Nandua will stay in D2 with their enrollment being over 700. Radford will be D1 unless their enrollment goes up more than 11 students. Lets give this a chance. It will showcase some excellent matchups instead of the same old same old we see every year now.
    I kind of like the change and agree that the state game will be on more even footing But with teams like Radford and George Wyth now being Div 1 region C will have tougher teams in Div 1 than is currently the case

    It will be interesting to see what the matchups would be if the plan was in place this season of if the numbers will get juggled around if/when the school closeing happen in WC (Div 1 will be down 3 schools will they bump up the cutoff number or what?)

  5. #45
    Inactive Member 1inStripes's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 25th, 2002
    Posts
    12,052
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Down 3 or down 2? I doubt they change much. You never know how a couple of other schools enrollment may change as well.
    "Call me crazy, but I want to buy the Dallas Cowboys end zone and have the star right at the foot of my bed. That way when I score, I can spike the ball right on the star!" -Woody Paige, Around the Horn 10.9.08

  6. #46
    Inactive Member Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 1999
    Posts
    1,019
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by 1inStripes View Post
    Down 3 or down 2? I doubt they change much. You never know how a couple of other schools enrollment may change as well.
    3 (I was thinking Kelly would have been Div 1 as well)

    Of course in 2 years they would be down 3 more if Clintwood, Haysi and Ervinton consoladate

  7. #47
    Inactive Member 1inStripes's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 25th, 2002
    Posts
    12,052
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Maybe Kelly would have been. I forgot about that possibility. I really dont forecast them changing the enrollment number as much as they may move Pioneer teams that may be shifting to the East in the new alignment back over to the west side of the cutoff.
    "Call me crazy, but I want to buy the Dallas Cowboys end zone and have the star right at the foot of my bed. That way when I score, I can spike the ball right on the star!" -Woody Paige, Around the Horn 10.9.08

  8. #48
    Inactive Member Jason's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 12th, 2002
    Posts
    3,146
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by 1inStripes View Post
    Maybe Kelly would have been. I forgot about that possibility. I really dont forecast them changing the enrollment number as much as they may move Pioneer teams that may be shifting to the East in the new alignment back over to the west side of the cutoff.
    I dont see being down 3 a problem either. Enrollment numbers probably stay the same. Wonder when all this will be final?

  9. #49
    Inactive Member Jason's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 12th, 2002
    Posts
    3,146
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by Counts View Post
    I kind of like the change and agree that the state game will be on more even footing But with teams like Radford and George Wyth now being Div 1 region C will have tougher teams in Div 1 than is currently the case

    It will be interesting to see what the matchups would be if the plan was in place this season of if the numbers will get juggled around if/when the school closeing happen in WC (Div 1 will be down 3 schools will they bump up the cutoff number or what?)

    George Wythe will have to lose about 24 students by next year to be Division 1. As of right now it looks to be Radford, Chilhowie, Auburn, and Patrick Henry in Region C that will drop to D1. Grundy could have been D1 next year also but their enrollments have spiked. They have went from 444 in 08,09 to next year having about 505. Kelly will have 470 students next year to will be 20 to big to be D1 also. The only Region D schools that will drop next year are Honaker, and Coeburn.

    You can go to VDOE :: Superintendent?s Annual Report to find the enrollments for next year. You will have to do some math work but it shows what they will be.

  10. #50
    Inactive Member Counts's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 27th, 1999
    Posts
    1,019
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Future of the LPD

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason View Post
    George Wythe will have to lose about 24 students by next year to be Division 1. As of right now it looks to be Radford, Chilhowie, Auburn, and Patrick Henry in Region C that will drop to D1. Grundy could have been D1 next year also but their enrollments have spiked. They have went from 444 in 08,09 to next year having about 505. Kelly will have 470 students next year to will be 20 to big to be D1 also. The only Region D schools that will drop next year are Honaker, and Coeburn.

    You can go to VDOE :: Superintendent?s Annual Report to find the enrollments for next year. You will have to do some math work but it shows what they will be.

    Interesting....When do the VHSL Numbers come out if I rember those numbers are always a little differant from the state numbers (And I do not understand why that is)

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •